|
Sore
Loser
by
Prentice Cushing
1997
Those
of us who donated to the AMERICA'S CUP
HALL of FAME to help with
the Sappho mast placement and plaque-mounting may have chuckled
over the most recent announcement of the 1997 Induction of selectees for
the HALL of FAME whereby we are advised that Past Commander James. L.
Ashbury of the Royal Harwich Yacht Club will become the latest Member. In
view of his protracted battles with the New York Yacht Club in general and
William P. Douglas in particular, some may think that he belongs in a Hall
of Infamy! It will be recalled that when Sappho was first built on
speculation by Poillon Brothers in Brooklyn, she was sent to England in
1868 with the hope of selling her. Although the big 274tonner made a good
crossing (New York to Cowes in fourteen days) she finished last in a Royal
Yacht Squadron race around the Isle of Wight, having been beaten by a
fleet of smaller yachts. The winner was Cambria , a 227-ton
schooner owned by Mr. Ashbury . He was the son of a wheelwright who
invented a railway carriage and acquired a large fortune. It was said that
he sought social prestige through yachting. After Mr.Douglas purchased Sappho
in England he turned her over to builder and able sailor Captain Bob
Fish, who stripped her planking, adding hips to the frames and reballasted
her, so that she became a much faster and more stable yacht. Mr. Ashbury,
being aware of her poor original performance, issued in 1869 the first
challenge for the Cup Race to be held in August of 1870.
In
the spring of 1870 Mr.Douglas and Captain Bob, by now Sailing Master of Sappho,
went to England, crossing in twelve days and nine hours. After much
acrimonious correspondence, Mr.Douglas and Mr.Ashbury engaged in a series
of three races starting 10 May 1870. In the first Sappho was so far
ahead that Cambria withdrew; Ashbury refused to start the second
race because he disliked the course. In the third race Sappho beat Cambria
by two hours and sailed home to the acclaim of his friends and
Douglaston neighbors, as previously reported here.
Mr.
Ashbury was certainly a keen sailor and was proud to have had Cambria be
the first British yacht to transit the Suez during opening ceremonies. He
was the first challenger for the Cup, when Cambria was forced to
sail against a whole fleet of eighteen schooners (not including Sappho)
rather than in a match race (as was America in the race that
started the whole series). He seemed to be a good sport about it, donated
several cups to the Club and continued to race in American waters until
the end of October. After returning to England he again challenged, but
wrote complaining about this situation. For the second challenge the NYYC,
at the insistence of sportsmanlike George Schuyler (sole surviving member
of the original America syndicate), agreed to a match race but retained
the right to pick any one of four yachts for each race.
After
Sappho's earlier performance and
knowing he would be facing Sappho in the forthcoming second
challenge, the assiduous letter-writing Mr.Ashbury bombarded the NYYC
requesting numerous changes to the conditions for the match, all contrary
to the Deed of Gift, including a proposal to sail twelve races, one for
each of the yacht clubs he could represent (not including the Royal Yacht
Squadron) if was initially unsuccessful. Meanwhile he had commissioned
Michael Ratsey to build a new challenger, the schooner Livonia which
was as much a copy of Sappho as he could contrive. As we all know,
the now 3 10-ton Sappho won the Cup on 23 October 1871, but not in
Mr. Ashbury's eyes.
At
the NYYC General Meeting of I February 1872, held in the Clubhouse at
Madison Avenue and 27th Street, a letter from Mr.Ashbury accused the Club
of numerous unfair practices with the result that the Club returned to him
the cups he had presented in 1870. That summer, when he took Sappho to
Europe, he withdrew from a French regatta when he teamed that Livonia was
entered, but sailed unofficially and walloped her. The NYYC-Ashbury
feud ended unpleasantly in October when the Club sent a long letter of
defense and particulars to the Royal Yacht Squadron (original donor of the
Cup) with copies to other foreign clubs.
Mr.
Ashbury's plethora of protesting correspondence did indeed result in
ending the practice of using more than one yacht to defend the Cup. Today
he would probably be considered just another sea-lawyer who prefers the
protest room to the race course. It is good to see some of this recent
maneuvering disappearing, probably in good measure owing to the new Rules
31 & 44, which permit use of a 360 degree or 720 degree turn on the
course when a protested yacht feels responsibility. I recently served as
Chief Judge at MORC Internationals for the Rudder Trophy (which our
own Dave Knickerbocker won in the sixties) and was pleased to have only
one case, which we did not hear after the protester found that he was in
error on facts and withdrew. Let's hope that universal good sportsmanship
is on the way back and that Mr.Ashbury is looking down on the Hall of Fame
knowing that he deserves the honor and is having second thoughts about
protesting rather than sailing!
|